Henry Korman sent this letter to Newton Mayor Setti Warren this weekend…
Mayor Setti Warren
City of Newton
1000 Commonwealth Avenue
Newton Centre, MA 02459
Mayor Warren:
This letter is my resignation from the Newton Housing Partnership and the Newton Fair Housing Committee. I resign in protest over your decisions concerning Engine 6, which I consider to be acts of discrimination.
I was appointed to the Partnership in 2005, and I have served on the Fair Housing Committee from the time it was first established as an advisory group to the Housing and Community Development Division of the City’s Planning Department, also in 2005. My contributions were not as an individual but rather as one person within a collaboration of citizens, City staff and elected officials whose aim was to effectuate a vision for the expansion of inclusive, affordable housing in Newton. Central to the collaboration has been a key moral and legal imperative. City housing and community development activities must at all times be carried out without discrimination, and with the objective of taking affirmative steps to further fair housing for all groups of people protected by civil rights laws, including people with disabilities and people of color.
Your decision to withhold funding from Engine 6 violates that central ethic. It denies homes to individuals who experience difficulty navigating the housing market because of their disabilities and history of homelessness. Based on what is known about the characteristics of the likely inhabitants of Engine 6, it also has the effect of excluding people based on race, color and national origin. Your stated reasons for withholding funds lack credibility. Your purported desire to stop the project in order to carry out “a community conversation around affordable housing” is contradicted by your decision to cut short the public comment process for funding Engine 6. Your protestations, made through the Commissioner of Public Health and the Director of Planning, that the individuals expected to live at Engine 6 would not receive the services needed for a successful project are not supported by the facts. The ability of Pine Street Inn to fully serve the residents of its housing is well documented. It is City officials that expressed the view that no City services would be available to Engine 6 tenants, a condition that can in no way be attributed to the project.
More to the point, you are withholding funding because you know that the project cannot go forward without City support. Your administration’s explanation for taking this action is based on presumptions that the people with disabilities who will live at Engine 6 must receive supportive services to the City’s satisfaction as a condition of living in Newton. Denial of housing opportunity based on this sort of stereotyping and on the imposition of conditions that are not applied to people without disabilities is the hallmark of discrimination. The justifications offered up for your decisions concerning Engine 6 are more than pretext. They are expressions of prejudice.
Whether intended or not, the decision to withhold funding from Engine 6 shows contempt for City staff, the members of the Partnership and the members of the Planning and Development Board, all of whom examined the Engine 6 proposal and recommended funding and full City support. Your decisions also disrespect the hundreds of City residents who have expressed their support for Engine 6 and their dismay at your withholding of funds. Tremendous injury has been done to what until now has been a collaborative effort at achieving a more inclusive and equitable City of Newton. I am unable to continue to serve on the Partnership and the Fair Housing Committee as part of an administration that has so little regard for this principle and that engages in acts of discrimination. As a consequence, I am compelled to resign.
Sincerely,
Henry Korman
WOW, strong letter.
Good riddance.
It’s all innuendo and name-calling in an election period. It would be interesting to know if Ted has any connection to this, since this is his hallmark attack on the mayor. Setti clearly gave his reasons, and just because a handful of people sign a document disagreeing with him doesn’t make Setti guilty of discrimination or prejudice.
Barry, I specifically excluded myself from discussions relating to the Fair Housing Committee’s letter to the Mayor advising him of the committee’s concerns, but I wholeheartedly agree with the substance of the committee’s letter. It is regrettable that the Mayor still has not responded to the Fair Housing Committee’s original letter, sent back in early July.
I was completely unaware that Henry Korman was planning on resigning from both the Fair Housing Committee and the Newton Housing Partnership until I received his letter by email sent to the Committee members on October 6. Henry is an attorney and long-time advocate for affordable housing and fair housing laws, and he and Sheila Mondshein, another attorney whose professional career has been focused on fair housing laws, have been invaluable to both the Committee and the City.
Henry’s hard work, commitment and extensive knowledge,achievements and experience in the areas of housing affordability and fair housing will be sorely missed on both the Committee and the Housing Partnership.
The City’s letter is plainly discriminatory against mobility impaired people.
Barry, I disagree. This is a real loss for the Newton community. I don’t blame Henry for resigning, the mayor’s actions have been very disappointing.
I would like to see if the Planning board raised any of the questions that the residents or the mayor’s office has brought up. Or were they purely a rubber stamp for the developer.
One of the board member attended the “lively” meeting in Waban Library and seemed to indicate lack of a thorough discussion at the board meeting.
I would like Mr Kroman to show if he performed his duty, before he drags others for doing theirs.
Nathan – I don’t see how the city’s letter was discriminatory against mobility impaired people. To the contrary, the city wanted to ensure that housing for mobility impaired people was sited in a place that would work logistically for them. Accessibility is a crucial part of housing for the disabled and this location didn’t pass muster.
There are two things about the words in this letter that I don’t get. First there’s an imbedded assumption that these funds will never be used to benefit the very kinds of people he says were discriminated in this one proposal. Second, he is another lawyer using legal words, suggesting discrimination — isn’t a member of the Bar REQUIRED to report any crime or injustice? Where are the legal papers?
And I don’t get the strategy — how does one effect change as an outsider?
Maybe I was too harsh, I didn’t mean to suggest he’s doing anything he doesn’t feel will hurt others or inhibit the cause — just wondering if this was the right approach in the long run.
The loss of Henry from these committees is huge for the City, and I personally will miss his insight, fairness, intelligence and humor. The legal issues aside , I can certainly understand why someone like Henry would feel it foolish to spend hours on these committees only to have his reasoned and educated judgement dismissed. Newton Dad, there are no rubber stamps at these committees – to suggest that is laughable and offensive. You clearly have no idea how much time and work volunteers spend counseling the Mayor – he chooses and appoints us for our professional backgrounds and willingness to serve. To have the recommendations dismissed with the discussion CUT OFF BEFORE THE HUD REQUIREMENTS STATE WE MUST LISTEN makes our efforts fruitless and leaves the City at a true disadvantage.
@Native Newtonian – You may be right. But there is NO EVIDENCE that they completed their due diligence.
IF they had, they should have spoken up when the residents or the city raised questions.
I commend these people who volunteer their time, and I ask you or the Board members to show the product or their effort.
Maybe attend some of the hearings that are open to the public, and are advertised in the Tab? Also, I believe (not sure) that minutes are on the City’s website. The point is not that there is no evidence: it is that no one opposed to this project were willing to hear the evidence, or look for it. And I keep coming back to the same simple point: HUD requires a 30 day public comment period. This mayor shut that comment period down short of the requirement. Maybe the evidence could have come out in the meeting cancelled by the mayor, or in subsequent discussion?
Newton Dad, to describe these committees as a rubber stamp for the developer shows a lack of knowledge of the process and the role they play. The meetings are open to the public, and many of us find the time to go (or at least listen to those who actually attend the meetings). There is plenty of evidence that this project got vetted appropriately, including by the mayor’s people. One the NIMBY reaction started, the mayor cut off debate and ended the project. So before accusing others of not doing their jobs, spend an hour or so at a fair housing meeting, or a planning committee meeting, or the various other meetings where volunteers work to help the city run efficiently. You are welcome to disagree with the project, but the vetting was done, EXCEPT for the NIMBY reaction. And if the public comment period had taken place we would all have seen that.
Hoss, I think Mr. Korman did exactly the correct thing here. Your remark regarding his obligation to the legal bar implies that Mr. Korman has done something unethical here by not reporting the actions of the city to the “bar”. Nothing could be further from the truth. The city is not beholden or policed by the legal bar of Massachusetts, so your remark doesn’t match the way the system works. His only choice was to stay or to resign. You can disagree with his decision to resign, but I think others here will tell you the city will be a worse place without people like him.
Finally, folks who post here know that I’m a regular poster since this blogs inception, and before this on the newton tab blog. I realize this particular issue is heated, but we should treat our neighbors who give back to the city with some respect. Some of the posts on this thread don’t show that.
fignewtonville — First, I regret commenting on Mr Korman’s letter because he is not a public person and I should not judge him.
In terms of the Bar comment, if a lawyer identifies any violation of law, I think the Bar requires that the lawyer report it to the appropriate authority (not the bar).
If I could delete my comment, I would.
Hoss thanks for the response.
I think the Bar’s ethical requirements are not applicable for a discriminatory effect issue like this, but let’s not debate this after your most recent posting.
fignewtonville,
I think these comments by Korman are unfair and he deserves to be criticized on this blog for making them, especially if he knew that they would be publicized.
“Denial of housing opportunity based on this sort of stereotyping and on the imposition of conditions that are not applied to people without disabilities is the hallmark of discrimination. The justifications offered up for your decisions concerning Engine 6 are more than pretext. They are expressions of prejudice.”
I say again, even if you don’t agree because you like him, good riddance.
“…especially if he knew that they would be publicized.”
Barry- I assume you made the comment tongue in cheek.
How did Village 14 come in to possession of this letter?
Korman doesn’t get his way so he quits. Helluva leader there. Nothing like forging ahead and sticking in the fight.
Newton Dad said, “One of the board member attended the “lively” meeting in Waban Library and seemed to indicate lack of a thorough discussion at the board meeting.”
I was at that meeting, and the person there from that committee was embarrassingly unable to provide even a modicum of rationale for that committee’s vote. [I have to say that he clearly didn’t want to make any statement, and I did feel bad that the alderman largely in charge of the meeting didn’t spare him what turned out to be such an embarrassment].
Jane:
“Barry- I assume you made the comment tongue in cheek.”
Why do you say that?
@Hoss,
Even though lawyers are referred to as officers of the court, they do not have an affirmative duty to report any and all violations or legal infractions they encounter to appropriate authorities. They do not possess the powers or responsibilities of officers of the law, and to be candid, if we did have that burden it would probably be terrible for business! As for your earlier comments, I know there have been times when I wish I could go back and edit my own comments. It takes a lot of character to step up and say ” If I could delete my comment, I would.” A LOT of character. Have a good night.
Kim, he was volunteering. And the Mayor cut the legs out from under his committee. You can disagree with the project or his view in the letter, but as a volunteer, I’m not sure how you can question his leadership after the Mayor’s action.
As for the lively meeting at the library, I was not there. But Dan, it sounds like it would have been a stressful situation for anyone, never mind a volunteer.
Barry-because it seems pretty obvious that the intent was to publicize it.
C’mon, Vilage 14. A little transparency, here. Who supplied this letter for the purpose of publication, matters. What’s the agenda?
C’mon Bill. You know we aren’t going to tell you how we got this letter. If we disclose sources who request anonymity, why would anybody trust us with information?
Besides Bill, I would suggest that the substance and author of the letter are what’s important here, not the source.
My apologies. I deprived you of both ls. “Village” 14.
I thought all communications whether via letter, email to a public official are public record?
Mr. Korman is a former civil rights specialist at the U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, and has a very impressive background in fair housing development and law reform. If I were in the Mayor’s shoes I would be paying extremely close attention to this person’s opinion.
Lisap,
If I were the mayor, I wouldn’t worry about this crybaby who didn’t get his way. “a very impressive background in fair housing development and law reform” may just make him another Ted Hess-Mahan who wants to steal from one part of society to give to another. That’s not the job of government.
Unfortunately, we’ve come to a point in society where many people think it is. “Fair” is in the eyes of the beholder. Being older than you, I can remember when the notion of giving people government welfare at all, at the state level, was hotly debated. Many people feared that we’d create a system of dependency on welfare that would create welfare cheats and a non-productive segment of society. So, here we are today with people assuming that, in the name of fairness, it’s government’s job to give them stuff, and with way too many cheating the system in order to get it. Really a sad outcome.
Barry,
It’s the job of the government to catch the people that have fallen through the cracks of society, to help those in need. We have welfare/unemployment for those who can’t find a job and earn money, we have social security for those that society deems ready to retire from a job and we have disability if you’re hurt and can’t work and make money. I would qualify chronically homeless people are people in need of our governments support.
Barry, I know that I have posted this to you before but here we go again: the law is the law. We comply because we must, not because we feel like it. Don’t like the laws? Do something to change them, but comply, we must. Our mayor has thumbed his nose at the law, thumbed his nose at those who, as volunteers, vetted this project and found it worthy, thumbed his nose at ALL of us by opening the city up to a law suit.
Tom,
We pay for Social Security. Companies pay for unemployment compensation and long term disability insurance. Making people who “fall through the cracks” lifetime dependents is not the answer. There are for sure people who simply can’t take care of themselves. Families and charities used to help them, and of course still do. We have a system now of people who scam the government because the government bureaucrats who manage these programs are more interested in having enough to do so that their jobs are secure than in ascertaining if people really need the help.
I don’t know what a “chronically homeless” person is exactly. Can you explain?
Native Newtonian,
There’s nothing in the law that says that the Engine 6 project per se is mandated.
Barry,
If the City wants HUD’s grant money then it has to play by HUD’s rules. I understand your substantive argument about a culture of entitlements, but I don’t think those policy issues are really in play here because the City has put itself into HUD’s ball game by accepting CBDG grant money. When a former civil rights litigator for HUD calls foul, whether one agrees or disagrees, I think it’s definitely worthwhile to pay attention because HUD can and does examine compliance with local administration of its funds. If it finds that the city did not comply with rules and requirements to further affordable housing then those funds may be in jeopardy. The project is dead but I’m not at all confident that we’ve heard the last of this.
Just a quick follow-up: Newton is considered an “entitlement community” by HUD. This link provides a brief overview of eligible activities, how the city may use CBDG funds pursuant to its “Consolidated Plan”, and requirements for citizen participation. Happy reading!
http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/comm_planning/communitydevelopment/programs/entitlement
Bill, a little transparency from you as well. I honestly don’t remember if you are officially involved in the Mayor’s election campaign or just a supporter. And I say that as a supporter of Setti (I’m voting for him based on the overall picture, not Engine 6).
And Gail, I didn’t realize the blog has journalistic ethics. Good thing to know and good decision. I also agree that the letter speaks for itself. Would it change folks mind about it if it was sent directly to the Tab?
I second Gail’s point and also note that another highly relevant letter, the City’s letter laying out the putative reasons for denying the project, should be a publicly available document but doesn’t presently seem to be.
wow, “putative”. I didn’t even know what that meant. But, now that I do, it doesn’t seem appropriate. Nice try.
Tomsheff, on this one point I agree with Barry Cohen. I resent your linking welfare with the unemployment program and social security. For most people, they need to have worked and financially contributed to the two later programs for multiple years to qualify for payments. Welfare is not an entitlement; it is free money given to those in need subsidized by working, tax paying people.
I believe in the welfare program to help those that truly need help. But let’s not confuse government gifts with programs that require prior work and/or financial investment.
Gail: This is not a news site (I believe Greg hails it as “the People’s Blog!), which means that journalistic ethics really are not entirely appropriate. You cite the source or not by choice.
This letter slams the Mayor. The author knew it would be a public document. So, it is odd if the author would then have any issue with being cited as the source. However, if the source was someone with an agenda, like say, a candidate for political office, then we should know that. Journalism or not, that is fair.
Fig: Allow me to savor the rich irony of a pseudonym calling me out on transparency.
@Bill: This was not a private letter sent to only to Mayor Warren. It was cc’d to the Newton Housing Partnership, Newton Fair Housing Committee and Candace Havens.
@Bill: I should add: I don’t recall calling this the People’s Blog, but good for me if I did!
We are citizen journalists here, some us even used to — or, in at least one instance, still do — get paid to do journalism. It’s odd that you’d think this would be different but more importantly, unfortunate that you’re trying to deflect the conversation. Korman’s comments are substantive. His credentials are significant. That’s what matters.
Bill,
While journalist ethics may not be the governing principles of the blog, I see no harm with bloggers on Village 14 keeping them under advisement.
I don’t understand the scenario you laid out. Is there any doubt that the people who support Engine 6 have an agenda? I don’t think they’ve been quiet about it. Any number of people could have sent this letter to Village 14.
I, too, had to look up the definition of “putative.” Seems like a very appropriate use of that word to me!
Putative
Generally regarded as such; supposed.
generally believed to be something
purported; commonly put forth or accepted as true on inconclusive grounds
If the city lays out its reasons, which I think is how it’s used by Nathan, then I’d say the word is misused. If we the public think the reasons are or could be such and such, then it’s how I’d think the word should be used, based upon its definitions.
But admittedly, I’m no linguist and I could be misinterpreting something here.
Gail/Greg: Oh, please. Who is deflecting? I’m not saying that the author is without credibility or that his letter is not substantive. I don’t agree with some of its conjecture, but that’s one person’s opinion.
And yes, Gail, any one could have provided it. Heck, I could have (fig: I did not). But some one provided it. And it does matter if that person is a political opponent to the letter’s intended target.
Bill Brandel — I’d ask you do do what I did; identify the most concerning shadows in the dark. Are they shadows that make a living off of ethical matters and not gov’t matters? I concluded “Yes” and stepped back.
Bill, I’m wasn’t calling you out, I really don’t know your relationship with the mayor and I didn’t think it was secret. I’m sure you’ve mentioned it at some point (supporter/formal supporter/paid employee, etc.), but I’m getting older and I can’t remember and I was curious. Savor the irony all you want. But I’d like to think my use of the fake name is a good example of why they are a good idea in concept (I don’t throw verbal bombs and I care about the community and the blog).
As for who gave this blog the letter, since it was cc’d to a bunch of folks per Greg, could be anyone, but it seems proper for Korman to tell the committees why he was resigning and his communication with the mayor. You may not like the letter, but as Gail points out he has good credentials in this area and seems well-respected from the comments on the blog.
Who sent it to you is certainly as relevant as the content of the letter at this point in time, and it’s kind of strange for V14 to think that they wouldn’t be a concern to readers.
Bill Brandel is right to ask the question.
It’s an election year and Ted Hess Mahan has used Engine 6 and Affordable Housing in general as one of his campaign talking points, including the earlier “Discrimination” letter. Fanning the flames for his own purposes is his right, but if Village 14 is being used as a bullhorn for a campaign, we, the readers should be informed of it.
To prevent this conversation from being deflected away from the very important substance of Henry Korman’s letter on my account, for the record, I did not send this letter to Village 14, I did not direct anyone else to do so on my behalf, nor do I know from whom Village 14 received it. I did ask Greg and Gail, but they declined to reveal their source.
Thanks Ted
They just want to deflect the issue off the Mayor but pointing fingers at something else. Maybe they should realize that all communication of Public Officials is PUBLIC. So does it really matter.
And will they blame you too when the City gets cited by HUD or will they then realize that is FULLY the Mayors Responsibility.
Ted: Thanks.
Gail: We can agree to disagree. I don’t think that would be a first.
Hoss and Fig: I have no reason to question the author’s motives. I respect and admire the work that these folks do, for free btw, out of passion for their causes and for the City. Further, I don’t necessarily dislike the fact that he made the letter public. I am fan of daylight. However, while I am not equipped to speak to the merits of his position, I can say that I don’t like how he has positioned his position.
First off, Lets say Ted sent the letter (which he says he didn’t) but for argument sake lets say he did, does that change the content of the letter? If you accuse Ted of drafting the letter that would be a different story.
Second, Bill how would you feel if you worked countless hours on a project. A project that you are considered to be a specialist in. A project that got your unqualified approval. And the mayor, who has very limited expertise in the subject, outlined the process, was proactive by asking the developer to work in the city and all of a sudden he looks past all of this and rejects the project.
I’d bet you’d feel pretty dejected, too.
Thats why I never understood why people would volunteer for Mayor Cohen, he never took people’s advice, but they gave him their time anyway.
I’d like to know Korman’s relationship to Ted. I mean, he’s been on this committee since 2005 and decides to send an inflammatory resignation letter just before an election about an issue that Ted has been really vocal about. It may be all a coincidence, but….
Barry – the only person that created this MESS is the Mayor. Stop blaming everyone else. Mayor Warren did this all by himself.
Joanne,
This is only a MESS because Ted keeps harping on it and has a few fans that support him. The city doesn’t have an obligation to accept this particular project. Let’s move on. It’s a stupid location for people with various issues. No stores close by. Even the T is a good walk.
Ted is just milking this issue, just like I’m milking the Guantanamo issue. But his thinking on the Guantanamo detainee was really warped. It was inconsiderate of and potentially dangerous to the people who he would claim to be his constituents, and it showed a twisted sympathy for a man who was admittedly part of an anti-American terror group, regardless of what his specific role was.
There will be other opportunities for projects like Engine 6. But there are no more opportunities for the people killed by the Tsarnaev brothers.
Barry said, “This is only a MESS because Ted keeps harping on it”
A. Ted has not been on this thread except to answer questions of him. He could have been on this thread making a lot of noise, but he has too much class for that.
B. This is an absolute mess!!! This is indicative how the city is being run. The mayor makes promises to everyone, then one day it comes and bites him on the —. You can’t promise everyone everything!! It shows poor judgement, no backbone and lack of leadership.
Barry, you can’t sweep it under the rug, because I am sure this is just the beginning of people leaving committees, and just the beginning of city employees leaving city hall. ( I believe there was roughly a 33% turnover rate in the past 4 years). Do you know what the biggest waste of money for business’s is? Thats training new employees. Turnover means training.
Barry, you’re allowing the Mayor to play the Martha Coakley card and get your vote. By that I mean,he has refused many invitations to oppose Ted in many events and he still gets your vote? He refuses to go head to head with Ted… kudos.
If he wins, this will be the second election he wins with 0 issues. Saying he’ll do what he did in the past 4 years is not having an issue.
So, Tom, I guess this means you support Ted, because at the moment you have only two choices and you aren’t supporting Setti. Do you think the Engine 6 issue is more important in deciding between them than inviting a known member of an anti-American terror group to live among us in Newton?
Barry,
I think Ted was representing his constituents to the best of his ability. While, like you, I didn’t agree with it, thats not what alderman are here for. They represent their constituents, like lawyers represent their clients. Lawyers don’t get to pick their clients. Everyone has a right to their day in court, whether we like it or not.
While I like Setti as a person, I feel strongly we can do better.
I think Ted genuinely cares about the city and wont be looking to move up. I think he’s really smart, I know when I am in opposition of Ted in some issues he’ll write a response in support of his position which will make me re-think my own position and sometimes change my position. I know Ted shows qualities of leadership like taking tough stands on issues and not saying yes to everyone he’ll also take a stand on issues where he’s in the minority, which is also a sign of courage. He’s always engaged with the public, ie this blog. and he has a vision for the city.
I have been on the campaign trail with Ted and have grown to appreciate him.
So, yes I support Ted.
Everyone gives credit to the Mayor for everything, I guess I see things differently. I don’t think this city is being run very well. This Henry Korman situation is just indicative of what is going on in the city. The Tab and the Globe have picked up on the revolving door at city hall and Attorney Korman is just another red flag.
Before you ask me what the difference is between now and 4 years ago (when I strongly supported the Mayor), I’ll say that I have seen up front and personal how the Mayor will promise everything to everyone. I saw him promise Anatol that he supported the NC triangle and then a group of neighbors visited him and he told them he supported their side. I was with the Mayor when he told Srdjan that he supported the T project that would extend the green line to Needham, which would run parallel to Needham st, this would decrease traffic in the area and help business’s but he did absolutely nothing after that. He made promises to make phone calls and never did.
In short, 4 years ago all I had to go on was his promises (I had no idea he promised everything to everyone), now he has a record to run on.
@fig fair point re: respect for people volunteering. My comments, I believe, were along the same spirit and tone as the letter Mr Korman had written.
My comments were based on multiple documents I read as well as my experience at the meeting. While I stand my comments, I am sorry if my tone offended anyone.
@Tom. I wasn’t privy to the conversation between the Mayor and Srdj about extending the Green Line to Needham Heights, but I think that circumstances rather than a finger to the wind prompted what might have seemed to be a change in Setti’s direction. I, too, was and still am a supporter of the Green Line Extension Project, but it has become abundantly clear in the last few years that with all the cutbacks to T funding, it would be 10 or more years at best (more likely 20 or more) before this thing got rolling. In the meantime, the folks in Upper Falls came up with a no cost way of turning the old rail bed into a combination bike path and walking trail, i.e. the Upper Falls Greenway. I’ve been a strong supporter of this substitute because I thought it would be a boost for the Upper Falls and I was pleased that the Mayor jumped on board with his support, as well. He helped make all of this possible. This could be a great boost to the people and businesses of Upper Falls and I like to see places like the Falls and other older parts of Newton get a break because they usually don’t get as many as some other parts of Newton. Finally, the Greenway will, in no way, prevent the T from reclaiming the property for light rail somewhere down the road when funding becomes available. Hopefully, they will construct something that includes opportunities for light rail, bicycles and pedestrians. The good news is that there seems to be room in the old rail corridor to handle all three and I’m certain the people of Upper Falls will be first in line to make sure that happens.
Thank you to the Village 14 Blog for posting this letter. I am moved by Henry Korman’s conviction towards affordable housing and willingness make a clear statement describing the discriminatory effect by the actions of Newton’s executive office (read: Setti Warren). My only hope is the actions taken by this administration doesn’t effect the ever-dwindling CDBG funding received in the City of Newton from HUD.
Newtonians so much wanted to believe Setti Warren when he promised us accountability and transparency. How can we TRUST him to be our mayor for another 4 years? (Assuming he really intends to be here through 2018.) Even if you may not always agree with THM on the issues, we can TRUST Ted to carry out his commitments (and advocacies).
Bob,
I understand the downward trend of the economy effecting the project. But, I believe that Obama put aside billions for infrastructure projects, which I think this could have been turned into. No calls, no nothin’ just disappointment. (Mr. Mayor, if I’m wrong, please respond, I’d love to hear what you tried to do). Srdj went out of his way to get Needham on board of the T extension. He did a ton of legwork and spent years on the project and it’s a wonderful project. But, this is just one of many disappointments.
Bob, understand where I’m coming from, after making the initial introduction to Srj and Anatol and many others he made promises to, I keep in touch with each person and I feel I am to blame for Setti not keeping his promises. It comes back to me.
Tom wrote, regarding the Guantanamo issue,
“I think Ted was representing his constituents to the best of his ability. While, like you, I didn’t agree with it, thats not what alderman are here for. They represent their constituents, like lawyers represent their clients. Lawyers don’t get to pick their clients. Everyone has a right to their day in court, whether we like it or not.”
It seems to me that this was something that Ted and Linsky decided was a good move. The constituents weren’t clamoring to have terrorists residing in Newton. When these two brought it before the BOA, which represents all Newton constituents, it was soundly defeated. Still, in previous blogs, Ted continues, years later, to maintain that it was a good thing to do, even if it wasn’t passed. Something like “wouldn’t you want the country that treated you unjustly welcome you to live there”. Remember?
Tom, I want a mayor that isn’t ready to throw his constituents under the bus in order to satisfy a personal far-out philosophy. Ted is way too ideological for me. He belongs in advocacy groups like the human rights commission, not in the mainstream. Engine 6 is another example. It may satisfy some people’s guilt, but it doesn’t help Newton residents in any way to better their life. He just doesn’t care.
Barry,
Here’s the key line of the quote:
“Everyone has a right to their day in court, whether we like it or not.” If you attach this expression to elected officals, it means every constituent has a right to their day in front of the Board.
Barry,
I’m not here to persuade you one way or another, I’ve learned my lesson from 4 years ago. I was just answering and elaborating on your question.
Tom,
I’m not sure what you’re driving at, but, regardless of whom was being represented here, this was something that was risky for Newton, and was outside the scope of what our elected officials are supposed to do. It was a national issue and not a Newton issue. It was the kind of ideological move I’d fear more of should Ted have the power of the mayor’s office.
I also think that to spend $3 million of anyone’s money to house 9 people in a refurbished Engine 6 building seems like a poor use of money. Yet this is Ted’s signature advocacy in this election. He’s a very frightening guy. Speaks and writes well, but underlying it is someone who is not a clear thinker.
Newton Dad, thanks for the response.
Barry, believe it or not, there were a BUNCH of folks pissed off by this. Not everything should be seen through a political prism in an election year. Did you hear about the meeting a few weeks ago or see the letter in the tab from Engine 6 supporters? Not everyone is passionate about the mayor’s race. I would bet Korman is passionate about…affordable/fair housing. His letter concerned…affordable/fair housing. He volunteered on committees affiliated with…affordable/fair housing.
You are trying to argue his letter by pointing to his political motivations and thus say…aha, his whole argument is suspect because he is saying it as a Ted supporter. But the logic isn’t there. You’ve got Ted denying it, there is nothing anyone has said to support it, Ted isn’t mentioned in the letter, etc.
I think the importance of this letter is being lost in the politics.
fignewtonville,
I’ll say it one more time. There may be better sites for projects. The location of Engine 6 is bad for people with issues.
And, if the residents of the area for whatever reason don’t want it, then Ted should respect that, and not try to ram it down their throats. His first priority should be to represent his constituents, not some as yet unidentified group of 9 people. I want a mayor that works for me, not against me to do what he wants.
Setti did the right thing. Korman is a crybaby that didn’t get his way. And, Ted is an extreme ideologue, who would not benefit the greater majority of Newton residents.
Barry,
Believe it or not, I hate talking about people behind their back. The only reason why I do with our current Mayor and our past Mayor is because they don’t believe in blogging. So, instead of talking behind Ted’s back/in front of him, let’s ask Ted:
Ted, if elected, would you use the position of Mayor to further your political agenda?
Also Ted, how many events have you and the Mayor been invited to and the Mayor didn’t attend?
Tom – the question is better stated as this: how many city events has each candidate attended in the last two months? You may be surprised at the answer. Any candidates (and the public) can attend these events and many local candidates have chosen to attend them.
The Mayor and Ted agreed to 3 debates, and two are coming up in the next few weeks.
Jane, I’m glad to hear that, I really am.
Good. Check out the answer.
Lesson learned. The Affording Housing people don’t get their way on everything, they take their ball and go home. They throw hissy fits and start name calling. They use words like NIMBY, discrimination. They quit. They send out inflammatory letters. They host rally meetings. They use Village 14 and the Tab blog to piss and moan. They don’t acknowledge the legitimate points from the opposition including haste. That’s how you get support.
See you Korman. Way to burn out and not fade away.
Kim,
I think you know thats oversimplifying the situation. I think this situation occurred due to years of the Mayor putting obstacles in front of many of the affordable housing projects (atleast thats what I hear) and it’s not a one time phenomona. You’re asked to take time away from your family at no stipend and you expect your expertise will be utilized, but it’s not. This can get frustrating. Why volunteer at all? Let’s just let the neighbors decide whether projects can come into the city or not. Then, the Mayor has the unmitigated gall after putting obstacle after obstacle in your way, say he’s wonderful for affordable housing. It would tick me off, too.
Thank you, Tom, for articulating much of what I have wanted to post since reading Kim’s post. The only thing I would add: the mayor gave the proponents no choice but to hold their own “rallies”, and find their own means of communication since he CUT OFF DISCUSSION before all arguments / points of view could be heard!!
I would love it if this thread could be closed off. The personal attacks on Henry are rude and ridiculous, made by people who, I can only suspect, have never lifted a finger to volunteer for this city. He made the right decision for him and that is all that matters in this case. Volunteering for this mayor is akin to spitting in the wind.
Why do you guys think the mayor is opposed to all affordable housing efforts? That seems to be what you’re saying, not that he just opposed Engine 6. You’re accusing him of doing it and that Korman was reacting to that, but what does it gain the mayor to do this?
The politicization of this subject has reached absurdity.
Case in point- An example of a fear mongering demagogue:
At the second Library meeting, Tom Sheff stood up, took the microphone, introducing himself to the audience as a candidate for mayor and asked if the plans for the new Angier School included a barrier or fence of some sort to keep the dangerous homeless people away from the kids. He said that as mayor, he would work to keep children safe and the school is too close to this project. It was an outrageous comment that shocked even the most anti-engine 6 people in the room.
After the Mayor announced that he was not providing grants to the project and Sheff loses the primary and backs Hess-Mahan who is a supporter of the project, Sheff becomes an instant advocate for Engine 6 and uses it as a cudgel to beat up the Mayor. What a hypocrite.
A controversial project doesn’t get grant money and it’s become a Rorschach of how one feels about the Mayor.
Oh, wow….if that quote from Tom Scheff is accurate, I am appalled. I was just starting to like him, too!
Fig: What is the importance of the letter? My view is that a passionate person with a strong background in the subject of affordable housing is no longer serving the City because he very much disagrees with the Mayor on this particular project. His argument is an encapsulation of Ted’s complaints. Yes, thanks for serving, and thanks for providing your perspective on this matter. But going forward, does it matter?
At the end of the day, the majority of people in this City support this Mayor to make an array of judgment calls on many matters, including the important ones that impact our lives. He is doing here what most of us want done — and not because of NIMBY, or that we dislike disabled people, or that we are prejudiced, or any of the other accusations in this letter. This was rushed, poorly-planned, and it was unnecessarily contentious. Most people simply weren’t swayed that this was the best use of funds, and weren’t ready to embrace this. Maybe that would have changed over time. These proposals usually take years to get processed, and are usually resolved rather quietly. But the developer had a deadline, and it’s a campaign year. Either way, it didn’t work.
I do hope that however people feel about this, that we learn from this and do much better the next time around. This does not need to be a political football, and nor does it need to be divisive. Prior to this Mayor, this City was too often divided by pro-groups and anti-groups. It was an unpleasant civic encounter. You can smell some of that beginning to seep back into the discourse. Let’s reject that. It’s time to move forward and channel our energy into something that will make a constructive difference.
@Bill:
How do you know that this is how “most people” feel? Unless, of course, you are privy to some polling by the Warren campaign that we don’t know about.
So you’re suggesting that the mayor’s actions related to Engine 6 were driven by election year politics?
Woah! That’s very troubling (especially coming from someone who is clearly close to the mayor’s campaign who might have inside knowledge).
Well, Mayor Warren’s day just got a little worse: an arbitrator has ordered the City of Newton to reinstate Chief Cummings. I’m guessing the weekend can’t come too soon for the Mayor!
In re Cummings. City Solicitor Kahn says: ““While this [decision] could have the appearance of something big, we’re working on a ton of other cases, we’re not even focused on this at all”
Geez, can you word that any more poorly?
Bill, to be frank, I would expect the Mayor to reach out to improve that discourse. Sometimes I think Setti is so focused on his future career that he misses opportunities to admit mistakes and “improve discourse”. Step one would be to call Mr. Korman. Step two would be to actually address a meeting of those who supported engine 6 and put forth some proposals for other affordable housing in the city. The letter the city sent out in response to this was pretty weak and very defensive.
The mayor can always lead. Strange concept in this day and age, but I’d say on this one the mayor deserves a fair amount of the blame. Do you think either side here was well served by its city government?
Again, I appaud the mayor for his many successes, and I think the city is much more well run now than it was a few years ago in many ways. But to say that the mayor handled this well is just obvious spinning for political purposes. If he had handled it well, we wouldn’t be having this conversation.
And Kim, I realize you are angry about this particular project, but perhaps some respect for dedicated volunteers would be in order? Put yourself in their shoes for a moment. Wouldn’t you be frustrated by the mayor’s actions.
fig: Are you aware of the efforts that the Mayor has put into this exercise? He has met with the proponents and advocates. He attended those public meetings during the summer (unlike some of the most vocal proponents). When people will accept one, and only one outcome, which was not going to happen on their timeline, outreach goes nowhere.
And yes, I do think that we were served well by the Mayor’s decision to hold up this process. The City, nor this developer, had ever done this type of project. Pine St. Inn had not done this type of project in a place like Newton, and their answers to very practical questions revealed how unprepared they were to do this.
Again, it was unfortunate that this was turned into political theater. We were not well served by that.
Greg: Nice try. We had a preliminary. Did you catch the results? And any reasonable person can see who was trying to take political advantage of the situation.
@Bill: The turnout at the preliminary election was small and I hardly think that contest or even the contest on Nov. 6 should be viewed as a referendum on Engine 6 any more than it should be seen as a referendum on Canadian drugs.
Voters will likely reelect Setti Warren on Nov. 6 by a large margin but that does not mean “most people” agree with Warren on the way he’s handled Engine 6. I suspect “most people” will base their vote on other issues or the simple fact that they like the guy or aren’t convinced that Ted would be superior.
But you’ve ignored my question regarding your troubling acknowledgment that the mayor’s Engine 6 decision was driven by election year politics.
Are you retracting that?
I would also take issue with the fact that these projects “take years.” No seller, or developer, has “years” to waste. Certainly large projects like Riverside will take years but a little one like this? My God, the Hospice has moved, has vacated the building: do you really expect this seller to wait “years”, maintaining an empty building?
Greg: You are not even close. And yes, a preliminary is a measure of voter sentiment. Why, it’s even better than a poll!
Have a great weekend.
So Bill, I’ll take your response as an “I think I’ll duck out for the weekend instead of responding to questions about my claim that Mayor Warren’s Engine 6 decision was driven by election year politics.”
And thanks, I expect to have a good weekend. Go Sox.
Greg,
If Obama can say that his winning over Romney by a few percent indicated strong support for the widely disliked Obamacare, which he and people like Debbie Wasserman Schultz insist, than why can’t an overwhelming victory by Setti over Ted indicate a real support for him in an area where there is strong disagreement between them, among other things?
Greg – Reread the letter if you want to see some election year politicking. I don’t know this man, but this letter is way over the top in its emotional tone.
Meanwhile, you still haven’t answered the question as to who sent it to Village 14, so you might think about that. If you’re withholding legitimate answers to questions about a clearly political event that during an election year, then who are you to question others?
@Jane: I’m not going to say where the letter came from although Hess-Mahan already stated that he didn’t send it, a fact no one has disputed, including the people who know where it came from.
That’s not to say that is not an election issue. Hess-Mahan would acknowledge it is an election issue. And yes, the release of the letter and the resignation itself may very well have been timed to impact the election.
HOWEVER (and this is important) that’s different from Bill’s suggestion that Mayor Warren stopped this project because it was an election year. That’s a harsh indictment of our mayor’s integrity, given that it’s coming from a (now weekending) Warren supporter.
Jane, you’ve requested anonymity in contributing to this blog, and you have valid reasons for doing so. When someone requests anonymity while providing information that no one is disputing (meaning, no one is contesting the validity of the letter), you think we should disclose that source? I don’t get it.
Jane, I am pretty sure, knowing Henry, that this was not timed politically. You say that it is over the top in emotion? That is Henry’s commitment to justice, fair housing, and civil rights. Please don’t mistake his passion for grandstanding. He is a wonderful and sincere professional. This has gotten so out of hand, this bashing of him on Village 14. He believes in human rights. He uses his law degree to promote human rights. He used his spare time to champion those rights. He felt his time was wasted. He chose to exit. End of story. If others decide to turn it into politics, that is their agenda, not his.
Jholden,
While everything you said is 100% accurate, I believe you missed some things and I’d like to elaborate on other things.
First, I did mention a wall or fence at my short speech at the waban library. My background was that 25 years ago I volunteered at Pine St.Inn. At the time, the only tennants there were drunks and druggies. I hate to say it, but it was absolutely the truth. You can probably ask PSI and they will tell you the same. If you were over 60, you were an alcoholic, if you were under 40 you were a coke-head (not coca-cola) Thats just who their residence were at the time. Things are different now, there are people with disabilities and people affected by the economy there now. I was concerned about the residence (who I perceived to be druggies and alcoholics) wandering the streets and mixing it up with the kids, as I think any reasonable person would be concerned given what I’ve witnessed at PSI and given my background. So, yes I was nervous and yes I mentioned a fence or a wall. But I’d like to take all that back now. The presentation at the library was awful and there was still concerns regarding sexual offenders that was in the air that no one dismissed.
Second, the part between where I changed my mind, as an imperfect person is apt to do, I went to the meeting at the elliot st church which alleviated my concerns. They’ve proven to me that it’s a different type of resident there and I have lost all my concerns about the residents wandering the streets aimlessly, like they did at PSI.
JHolden, I wasn’t the only one that changed their mind. I believe that Jerry Reilly so eloquently wrote on this blog the process on how he changed his mind as well. We went through the same thought process, even went to the same meetings and came out with the same conclusions. You can single me out because I ran for Mayor, but I was far from the only one to go through this change of heart.
JHOLDEN, the meeting was so strong, that you may even have changed your mind as well. This was not a political decision, this was me being further educated on an issue and changing my mind.
Seeing both sides of the issue is what was wrong with Mayor Warren rejecting this idea before the open meeting. Unless you were heavily involved in this issue, you only got to see one side of the coin.
My goodness, Gail, I’m hardly anonymous. If you want to be a credible blog, then you provide sources. In fact, V14 usually does.
Bill was very clear in at least two posts that Greg had misconstrued his comment. In fact, I read Bill’s comment very differently – that the developer had a deadline and the proponents of this project used that fact to continue to keep the the project in the news because it’s an election year. Which is exactly what’s happened.
Huh. Really? I didn’t see it that way.
That’s plausible. I saw Bill as evading my question. I wish he had clarified.
JHOLDEN said:”Sheff becomes an instant advocate for Engine 6 and uses it as a cudgel to beat up the Mayor. What a hypocrite.”
JH, I don’t know how long you’ve been in Newton, but I have 4 years of the Mayor’s past I could use to cudgel him with.
I’m not a 1 trick pony, I have many issues with him, which seem to be getting worse (more obvious) by the day.
Jane, sad to say, I have no idea who you are, so at least to me you are anonymous. Unlike say, Mr. Korman. I agree with Native Newtonion, from everything I know of him he is a ethical man. And even if you don’t like his letter, isn’t it a bad fact for the city that long time volunteers like him feel the need to resign? Shouldn’t that count for something?
Bill makes Setti Warren out to be a hero in this situation. How? The problem is just politics? Most of the folks protesting the decision are STILL GOING TO VOTE FOR SETTI WARREN. (No offense Ted). Not everything is politics. And not every politico makes the right decision every time. But I’ll be damned if I’m going to praise Setti for any portion of this mess. Agree or disagree with the project, the mayor could of and should of done better.
We’ll see how he handles Austin Street. I don’t exactly have high hopes. But then again, Newtonville isn’t Waban, so maybe the mayor will act accordingly.
This is my last post for this particular thread. I feel like I’m repeating myself.
@Greg: You may be surprised if you attempt to vote on November 6th, since the election is to be held on Tuesday, November 5th. (FULL DISCLOSURE: I am a verified candidate for the Waban Area Council, along with twelve other Waban registered voters, competing for nine positions on the newly officially recognized Waban Area Council. You can vote early for the nine councilors at City Hall’s Election Department on October 31, November 1 or November 4 or on November 5, the same day as the Municipal Election, at Zervas Elementary School.)
@Sallee: Awwww, you spoiled my fun. Only the people who agree with me are supposed to vote on the 5th. Everyone votes on the 6th.
Fig – It’s sad to say that most of us on the blog don’t know each other these days. It was different in the past. In fact, I’ve met some very good friends here whom I actually see in real life.
I said clearly that I didn’t know this man, only that I thought the letter was too emotional. I’ve left jobs, retired, left volunteer activities to which I’ve been deeply committed, and in my experience it’s best not to burn bridges, even when the leaving is unhappy.
I have 3 young adult sons trying to find a path to a fulfilling professional life and my advice to them is always the same – leave a job on the best possible terms, never put anything negative in writing when you resign, and never speak negatively about past professional associations except to friends and family. I stand by that advice for anyone leaving a job or volunteer activity to which one is fully committed.
Let it all out Gregory — Mr Brandel was said to be a paid consultant for the Setti Warren for Senate campaign (as opposed to the Warren for Senate campaign). True? His blog participation appeared to be cut off after a short time in that run. True? And he (Mr Brandel) has rose again, proved to be an ineffective tout. True?
Jane, I actually agree with you on how to leave a job, and that is great advice for your kids. I think that does change when you rise to a certain level of authority or expertise. Most of the volunteers on the cities committees don’t need the positions for career purposes, they do it because they are passionate about the work. There is burning bridges and then there is having the courage of your convictions.
As for knowing you, I KNOW you on the blog, I just don’t KNOW you in person. 😉
The advice isn’t just for career advancement because I’m not really all that concerned about that. It has to do with how to leave with dignity. George Bush was my least favorite President, but we have something to learn from him about how to leave a position with dignity. In fact, our former mayor has been a excellent role model in this respect as well.
And Fig, you could have met me! In the past, we’d have occasional blog parties. You should have come. 😉
Greg – It’s a blog. The writing is quick and breezy, done in between odious household tasks or perhaps while packing to go away for the weekend. I interpreted Bill’s comment very differently than you. I thought the meaning was quite obvious and you interpreted it another way. No big deal.
Sorry, just getting back to the is blog. TomScheff and others: Does the fact that someone is a volunteer make their opinion more correct?
fignewtonville, I have respect for the opposition volunteers and their position until they throw hissy fits. There has never been an acknowledgment from the good people of the Engine 6 project that perhaps they acted in haste. They tried to railroad the project and when they didn’t succeed they called opponents like me discriminatory and NIMBY people. Seriously, would you feel the need to show respect toward people who handle a loss like that?
I think that this letter from the Newton Tab – highlights how the citizens of Waban want to help the homeless – as long as it in NIMBY.
Classic Newton – teach our kids UOD in school but dont know how to put that action into words unless it is another community. Like one blogger put it – this would be better off in Waltham. Oh wait – they already help the homeless in Waltham.
Newton —
As Engine 6 flares up again, I wanted to ensure that our fellow citizens know that those of us who are opposed to this project are not against helping the homeless. Many of us have worked to help the homeless cause. We all want to help homeless individuals get back on their feet, just not with this plan. Engine 6 should not be a referendum on the homeless issue.
The Metro West proposal is terribly flawed. It is impossible to summarize all of the issues that were poignantly made in the four-plus hours of community meetings about it. Suffice it to say, the concerns raised were sufficient enough for the mayor to act as he did. One’s level of study on this matter is inversely related to one’s distance from the firehouse. Our concern is that if this proposal is implemented, and there are negative ramifications, Waban will live with them permanently.
Additionally, our own Alderman, Deb Crossley, was one of the masterminds behind this. Although she and Metro West followed the precise process, it was done in a clandestine manner. There was plenty of time and many ways to inform the neighborhood which were not utilized. This tactic is used regularly to catch the abutters late in the game, before they can organize and react in a meaningful way.
I am grateful to our mayor, Setti Warren, for the way he has handled this. He was not seduced by sexy issues or pressured by powerful entities. He stood up for his citizens, which should be a mayor’s first priority.
So I am reaching out to you for solidarity. If this issue has impassioned you to be more active in the homeless cause, please act on that, but don’t support the Engine 6 plan. Help the homeless? Yes. Support Engine 6? No!
–Barbara D. Bower, Waban Avenue
Read more: http://www.wickedlocal.com/newton/news/x1868849840/Help-the-homeless-oppose-Engine-6-in-Newton#ixzz2hbcO3dZv
Kim, I don’t think being a volunteer makes you more correct. But attorney Korman’s qualifications are fantastic and that his opinion deserves to be weighed at a higher level than a normal layman on the issue (such as myself).
http://www.boston.com/yourtown/news/wellesley/2013/10/new_bus_route_connecting_wellesley_to_mbta_green_line_starts.html