Members of the TransitMatters advocacy group gave a very compelling presentation on Regional Rail last night at the library. Regional rail is their vision for frequent, reliable service on the commuter rail system with a fare structure to match the rest of the MBTA.  They provided some very timely and smart advice.  Here are some highlights:

  • Electrification will improve service, help the environment, and save money
  • Meanwhile, Regional Rail proposes incremental improvements to enable service every 30-60 minutes, all day
  • Double-platform upgrades to the Newton stations are strategic for communities from Boston to Springfield
  • Newton’s stations provide the key to mitigating Carmaggedon from the upcoming I-90 Allston project 

It’s that last piece that seemed to get the most attention. The Mass Pike construction makes the Newton stations an urgent project and should justify the use of federal mitigation funds.  This in turn can kickstart Regional Rail on the Framingham/Worcester line.  Cancelling the ill-conceived South Station Expansion project would easily free up enough to fund the rest.  The goal is four accessible Newton stations (including Newton Corner), 15-minute headways, and a $2.75 fare.

I’ll post a link to the video and presentation when it’s available. 

[UPDATE: Sean has

15 Comments

  1. Bob Burke

    I live in the Highlands, so I don’t use the Worcester to Boston commuter rail service. That said, I’m confused by:

    (1). The back and forth in several recent posts between those that describe crowded, standing room only trains during rush hour periods and those arguing that there are always plenty of empty seats.

    (2) The time lag between the construction of every proposed and conceivable residential project along Washington Street and the North of Newton in general and a realistic analysis of when the proposed improvements and upgrades to the commuter rail system will take place to accommodate a reasonable analysis of how many prospective new commuters these new projects will draw to the trains.

    (3) I think this time lag may be significant because every transportation study I’ve been involved with has stressed that needed new public transit should be in place before people move into new development projects. If the service is bad when they move in, it’s much more likely they will opt for other ways to commute and get around. It’s also likely that once they choose these other options, it will be difficult to get them to flip back to public transit.

    There are similar concerns in my neck of the woods about extended lag times between the introduction of additional commuters from Northland and Riverside and the upgrading of service on the Green Line.

  2. Mary Mary Quite Contrary

    You’re not kidding, Meredith! Miss a train? You could end up waiting for more than an hour until the next one. Need to go into work late because you have a doctor’s appointment? Better make sure you don’t miss the last inbound train that stops in Newton. Get a call from the school nurse to pickup your sick kid? The outbound trains are several hours apart during business hours, hopefully you can get there ASAP!

  3. Doug L

    FYI the MBTA approved funding of the design phase of Newton station accessibility project today at the FMCB meeting. https://cdn.mbta.com/sites/default/files/2019-08/2019-08-12-fmcb-M-newton-commuter-rail-stations-design.pdf . $5m allocated toward design.

    Of note:
    1. “Design so as not to preclude future construction of Alternative 2 which includes
    construction of a second side platform at each station and additional vertical
    transportation elements” (as expected)
    2. “As part of the project scope, an additional side platform at one of the
    three Newton Commuter Rail stations will be advanced to the
    conceptual design level to further define project cost and schedule
    impacts.”
    3. Construction phase is still contingent on the remaining funding magically appearing from somewhere.

  4. Adam

    So, I wonder, what are the criteria for choosing which station to upgrade to two platforms, and who gets to decide, the MBTA or the city?

  5. Doug L

    @Adam I have several replies, in no particular order:
    * The one that’s the least expensive
    * Whichever one is most likely to allow the MBTA to not do it
    * The operationally least intrusive to off-peak schedules
    * Village Cage Match!
    * Based on the city’s recommendations and developer contributions to Newton’s Transit Improvement Fund (which is being set up, right??)

  6. Ben Bayes

    @ Doug, West Newton because it’s the middle of the three?

    Full Disclosure: I’m heavily biased, West Newton is my stop.

  7. Emily Norton

    Thank you Adam for posting this, and also for your help in spreading the word about the event. Thank you also to event co-sponsors Green Newton, Newton Transportation Advisory Group, 350 Mass, and Mass. Sierra Club.