It wasn’t long ago that these newsletters were the exception and not the rule. I don’t know who was first, but I personally credit Jake Auchincloss for setting a high standard, and using his newsletters to inform and educate on any number of issues. His newsletters were often wonkish, but even where I disagreed he was thoughtful and presented hard data.

In the past couple of weeks, a new batch of newsletters has hit our inboxes. I’ve received several, probably because our Councilors share email distribution lists. I’ve been struck by how similar they all are. They talk about the gun store, zoning, the new police chief…. In my view what you don’t see are surveys of what’s going on in a given ward….construction updates, traffic detour issues, business updates. Also, there are different styles about taking a stand. Emily Norton produces a more detailed letter and isn’t afraid to state her views. In my opinion Marc Laredo is a highly effective Councilor, but his newsletters are sometimes so cautious that it’s hard to tell what he thinks or his newsletter’s purpose beyond just keeping his name out there. Everyone uses their newsletters to fundraise.

I always try to remember that our Councilors are essentially volunteers (minor stipends and healthcare benefits eligibility). They put in many hours. Yet these newsletters are a chance to solicit views, update and inform, and educate. In the absence of a full-fledged newspaper they can fill an information gap. They can counter the Mayor’s email newsletter where she often spins information that could really benefit from a critical discussion. They can also show which of our Councilors view themselves as true representatives, vs. someone who works issues of personal interest regardless of whether or not these resonate with their Ward and City voters.

In your view, who does the best newsletter? Why is it the best? Should it be the expectation that every City Counselor does one?