The Boston Globe today reported on the formation of the police review Task Force in Newton, slipping in an important tidbit:
According to a subsequent internal investigation by Newton police, the officer who conducted the stop — Sergeant Brian Tramontozzi — did not file a police report on the incident, despite regulations requiring him to do so. Officer Brian Conley, who drew his weapon, did not fill out a required police use of force form, that review found.
Sergeant Kevin Rudd, who conducted the internal affairs review, later found that officers “were prudent and justified” in conducting the stop, and determined it was reasonable for Conley to draw his weapon. On June 19, almost a month after the incident, Tramontozzi filed a police report at the direction of superiors.
I would not read too much into the no report issue. Filling those out is important, but there could be alot of benign explanations like – they wanted to home and would file the report the next day, they forgot, their supervisor did not remind them, etc.
Or maybe they did fill it out and their dog ate it.
Or, NPD does not enforce the requirement that officers fill out reports. Culture or standard practice?
I think that if we are going to allow anyone to openly carry a firearm and use it in the course of their job, it is not an unreasonable requirement that they fill out a report every time they take it out of their holster and aim it at someone. No excuses.
As far as not filling out an incident report, anyone who is supposed to protect the public should fill out a report whenever they stop someone, as in this case, suspected of a serious crime. Even if it is a case of mistaken identity. Again, no excuses.
I’m disappointed that this information was buried in a Globe story about the task force. I doubt officers pull guns on people very often in Newton. Not filing a report after doing so is important news that deserves its own story.
My daughter called the police recently after receiving a serious online threat. The officer came to our house to talk to her. She learned later that he did not file a report.
Officers generally do not file a report if no action is taken, if there is not going to be any police follow up. I can see it works both ways. An innocent person can end up in the police records for the public to see and have a bad name forever… when they are just the victim of some “harmless” prank. Aren’t there scams and cyber scams now where somebody calls the police and reports somebody they just don’t like? Sending the police to some innocent person’s home? I think it’s called SWATting – and the way the internet is these days.
If police are called because someone’s received a serious threat, there definitely needs to be a report in order to leave a written record. If that person makes another threat or escalates, the police have to know this is not the first time, plus it may be needed in court later if things reach that stage. There’s a reason for the saying that if it isn’t written down, it didn’t happen.
A teacher in Needham recently published this article which undoubtedly describes the degenerate thought processes of a not-insignificant proportion of cops in these parts. So much for the laughable civil service “Psychological Screening Plans” which were supposed to prevent guys like Lt. “Bill” from ever getting anywhere near the academy.
https://www.embracerace.org/resources/a-defining-moment-lies-in-front-of-us-yearning-to-be-embraced-again
@Michael, I would say you should definitely contact the City in which this individual serves – presumably in the public interest, paid by taxpayer dollars. You should and could and can get this on record. Contact the mayor of that city – in writing. Contact the chief of police – in writing. People in positions like this should be vetted and knowing what you know, having experienced what you experienced, you should and could be part of that process.
@Jane: You are asking Michael to report something a minor allegedly said 27 years ago. I am certainly not defending that person, but I don’t think people should get in trouble for things they said as a kid 27 years ago. If he has continued that behavior, then that is certainly another story.
@Jane and @Michael Singer,
Those are both valid points but just to be clear, the author of the passage I quoted above was Christopher Dancy (and not I) –
https://www.embracerace.org/resources/a-defining-moment-lies-in-front-of-us-yearning-to-be-embraced-again